Why did monster trucks bombard the office

Remember this is weird monster trucks A movie with a huge budget of 125 million dollars? For Paramount, this was supposed to start an entire franchise; However, the film bombed hard, grossing only $64.5 million worldwide. It ended up making the studio lose anywhere from $113 to $119.2 million. The 2017 movie was about Tripp, a giant truck builder, who gets into an accident at a nearby oil drilling site that knocks out a strange speed-loving creature. There are a lot of reasons why movies tend to explode, but for monster trucks, These reasons lie in the obvious side. Let’s examine the possible cause monster trucks Failed to communicate with the masses.

The introduction of monster trucks was strange

There is nothing wrong with weird movies. In fact, David Lynch – one of the best filmmakers of our time – is a master of weird movies. However, his films carry a strong, relatable message that audiences can relate to despite the frightening images. David Lynch understands the world he portrays through his films, which is why his films turn out so well. This also applies to films like Donnie Darko, The Lobster, 12 Monkeys, And Guardians of the Galaxy. These films embrace their eccentricity, but do not obscure the general themes and messages of said film. It’s rare to make an original movie these days, so getting a weird or whimsical movie probably means we’ll get something bold, daring and most of all original. monster trucks It deserves points for originality and the message isn’t too complicated. The main problem lies in the fact that the target audience is not completely clear. The film is clearly aimed at the young child demographic. The purpose of monster trucks It was to sell games.

However, the movie is there and it doesn’t translate well for kids. ET It has captured hearts of all ages because it tells a powerful story that appeals to all. monster trucks The biggest weakness is the script and how the movie hits the adults. There are plenty of truck stunts out there for kids, but there are times of unnecessary violence that doesn’t fit well with the demographics they’re targeting. Oh, and Tripp is a complete drip bag for a girl who’s probably a little too young for it. In addition, the strange design of the strange squid looks awkward, although it was clear that they were trying to get a cool and cute look. monster trucks Sounds like a PG-13 movie diluted to PG. Oddity actually contrasts with the rating, as this movie is likely a better fit for the PG-13 crowd. Don’t get me wrong, this is a bad movie so focus first on the best script; However, the film feels trapped in a PG world that screams more adult than PG friend.

talent shortage

Jane Levy (Don’t breathe, evil is dead) and Samara Textiles (Ready or Not, Three Billboards in Ebbing, Missouri) They keep making some great movies ; However, they were virtually unknown at that time monster trucks release. Lucas Till comes out of X-Men A franchise but never the focal point of any of the films. He even seemed to be on the cusp of stardom based on his leading role as MacGyver, but the TV audience wasn’t strong enough to catapult the film to financial success. The biggest names in the cast are Rob Lowe and Danny Glover; However, the two stars were not shown enough in the trailers to attract their fan section. Until then, Lowe and Glover’s fan base is an older generation, so their target audience will not spend money to watch this type of movie. I understand Paramount’s approach to choosing Lucas Till because they want a fresh young face that holds the franchise; However, they needed a large person perhaps to help sell this movie.

The premise doesn’t quite fit mainstream audiences and the trailers haven’t tempted viewers to watch the movie. There is no guarantee that an A-rated star would have helped this movie reach his financial goals. However, men like Denzel Washington, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Brad Pitt are on the A-list because their films often tend to appeal to a wide range of audiences. monster trucks Need Tom Holland or Timothee Chalamet. Again, there is no guarantee that this movie would have been successful with these names attached, but it surely would have attracted more people interested in the movie had they been cast as the lead. To be clear, there is nothing wrong with the lead role. He’s just fine as Tripp and his chemistry with the weird freak thing provides fun, but from a business perspective, he doesn’t have a track record of successful movies as the lead, so attaching a name to a talent should have been a top priority, especially when $125 million is invested in A hopeful privilege.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: